Go Goa Gone

Poolside 1 BHK Apartment in Resort

Siolim, Goa, India
Serene Siolim- Gateway to the pristine beaches of North Goa at Tropical Dreams Resort with Lush green surroundings Ground Floor across the biggest swimming pool in Goa is furnished with SplitAC Ref...
Vacation Rentals in Siolim

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Minister for Tourism and Culture, Mr. Nawang Rigzin Jora inaugurates Heli Skiing at Gulmarg


Minister for Tourism and Culture, Mr. Nawang Rigzin Jora inaugurates Heli Skiing at Gulmarg


Minister for Tourism and Culture, Mr. Nawang Rigzin Jora today inaugurated Heli Skiing at Gulmarg which is a joint venture of M/s Himalaya Sports and Moten Joseph of New Zealand.

Addressing on the occasion, Mr. Jora said that the youth of our state have a great potential and stressed upon them to channelize their potential in right direction and constructive manner so that our youth bring laurels to the state not only on national but also at international level.



Pakistan’s ‘Kashmir’ blindfold | Deccan Chronicle | 2011-01-28

Pakistan’s ‘Kashmir’ blindfold | Deccan Chronicle | 2011-01-28

Pakistan’s ‘Kashmir’ blindfold
by Indranil Banerjie


* Indranil Banerjie is a defence and security analyst based in New Delhi

January 28th, 2011

http://www.deccanchronicle.com/op-ed/pakistan’s-‘kashmir’-blindfold-074

The message from Islamabad is gaining in decibel: the generals want New Delhi to initiate talks with them on Kashmir. The latest in a string of couriers bearing similar tidings was the former Pakistan foreign minister, Mr Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri, who urged the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, to travel to Islamabad for talks on Kashmir. It is impossible not to detect a touch of urgency in Islamabad’s texting. For, they have reason to be concerned.

When the Kashmir Valley erupted in revolt in 1989, the popular slogan was azadi, or independence. The most prominent militant organisation at that time was the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF). Within a few years, however, a great change occurred in the armed struggle with the Hizbul Mujahideen, an Islamist organisation that unabashedly advocated the merger of Kashmir with Pakistan, emerging as the pre-eminent militant organisation in the state.

How this remarkable transformation occurred within the space of a few years has never been a secret in Kashmir. The sidelining of the JKLF and other pro-independence groups was carefully orchestrated by the Pakistan Army. Just as General Zia-ul-Haq had favoured pro-Pakistan Islamist groups in the Afghan jihad, his predecessors realised that the key to controlling the armed struggle in Kashmir was to pack it with men swearing allegiance to Muslim Pakistan. Accordingly, the Hizbul Mujahideen was created in 1989 and began operating in the Valley in parallel with the JKLF.

The pro-Pakistan camp used the age-old methods of coercion and assassination to purge the movement of the independent minded. Arif Jamal, a prominent US-based Pakistani journalist, in his book Shadow War: The Untold Story of Jihad in Kashmir, has painstakingly described how the Hizbul took control of the movement: “Hizbul Mujahideen operatives harassed, beat and murdered potential rivals, and the scale of the violence was enormous.

According to a Hizbul Mujahideen commander, the organisation eliminated some 7,000 political rivals. From the beginning of their campaign, Hizbul Mujahideen focused on disarming and kidnapping JKLF members, and many were brutalised in custody and beaten to death. According to Amanullah Khan, Hizbul Mujahideen eliminated more JKLF officials than Indian military agents had”.

According to Mr Jamal, “Hizbul Mujahideen militants also murdered some of the leading political leaders in Kashmir. They killed Dr Ahad Guru and Professor Abdul Ahad Wailoo (chief commander of Al-Barq, Al-Jihad and JKLF). Mirwaiz Farooq, a leading political personality in Srinagar, was also killed; Syed Ali Shah Geelani ordered his elimination”.

Recent admissions by key separatist leaders has once again exposed the role of pro-Pakistan forces in political assassinations, including that of Mirwaiz Mohammad Farooq, Abdul Ghani Lone and others. “No police was involved (in the killings)... It was our own people who killed them”, the former Hurriyat Conference chairman, Prof. Abdul Gani Bhat disclosed while speaking at a seminar in Srinagar in early January this year. He said that even his own brother, Mohammad Sultan Bhat, was murdered by his own people, by which he meant Kashmiri separatists.

Mr Bhat’s outburst rippled through the Kashmir Valley, prompting another separatist leader, Mr Sajjad Lone, to declare that “Truth, however bitter, must prevail”. Mr Lone’s father, Mr Abdul Ghani Lone, was among those assassinated. Although neither Mr Bhat nor Mr Lone specified who had ordered the killings, Mr Bhat maintained that everyone in Kashmir was aware who the killers were. Their fingers pointed squarely at the Hizbul Mujahideen, its Kashmiri leadership and their Pakistani handlers.

The timing of these disclosures is significant, for they suggest a change in Kashmiri perception. While the overall sentiment in the Valley remains anti-Indian, the pro-Pakistan slogans too have lost their resonance. A section of the separatist leadership is now signalling that it wants to be free of Islamabad’s dictations. By raising their voice against the assassinations and implicitly identifying the forces responsible, these Kashmiri leaders are attempting to distance themselves from pro-Pakistani forces that have held Kashmiri politics in complete thrall for more than two decades.

While India may not accrue any direct benefit from this development, it could help in creating an atmosphere for genuine talks with the separatists. For this to happen, New Delhi needs to ensure that the constant threat of political assassinations in the Valley is removed. Sadly though, New Delhi has consistently failed to protect those who favoured a settlement that even hinted at a possible diminution of Islamabad’s perceived interests.

Today, Kashmir politics is undergoing a significant transformation. Pakistan is no longer the role model or a mentor. During last year’s summer unrest, no pro-Pakistan slogans were raised. When Mr Syed Ali Shah Geelani tried again to champion Pakistan, he was heckled and his house attacked. The generals in Islamabad realise that to remain relevant in Kashmir politics, they must compel New Delhi to initiate talks on Kashmir. It is clear, however, that bringing Pakistan back into the Kashmir picture at this juncture would amount to giving away something for nothing. With a number of Kashmiri leaders, including some separatists, are challenging Pakistan’s frightening hegemony, it would be the supreme irony if New Delhi was to reintroduce Islamabad’s generals into the Valley’s political scenario.

* Indranil Banerjie is a defence and security analyst based in New Delhi

Mirwaiz Moulvi Farooq, was eliminated on Syed Ali Shah Geelani's order: Arif Jamal, prominent Pakistani journalist.

Mirwaiz Moulvi Farooq, was eliminated on Syed Ali Shah Geelani's order: Arif Jamal, prominent Pakistani journalist.

 
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=148374098553712&set=a.101258713265251.444.100001433674673&ref=nf

Mirwaiz Moulvi Farooq, was eliminated on Syed Ali Shah Geelani's order: Arif Jamal, prominent Pakistani journalist.


Epilogue Press “Hizbul Mujahideen militants also murdered some of the leading political leaders in Kashmir. They killed Dr Ahad Guru and Professor Abdul Ahad Wailoo... Arif Jamal
6 hours ago · Like ·

Zafar Choudhary this is firt time that someone has been named but there is nothing surprising in nature of information. Last month senior Hurriyat leader Abdul Ghani Bhat also said that Moulvi Farooq, Abdul Ghani Lone and others were killed by "our own people". His thoughts were seconded by Sajjad Lone in an article in Greater Kashmir the next week
6 hours ago · Like · 1 person ·

Taj Tantry Yes it was an open secret that Pakistani forces were behind the assassinations of Lt Moulvi sb and LOne sb...
@Zafar sb..But in case of Dr Ahad Guru it is for the first time some one from Pak saying some thing.. It is widely believed to be a state police conspiracy with some arrested millitant..as confirmed by present CIC Mr Wajahat Habibullah in his disclosure some years back...
5 hours ago · Like ·

Bakhtawar Malik Now the latest Propaganda....I think if we ignore the comments...we can live happily.
5 hours ago · Like · 1 person ·

Taj Tantry ‎@Bakhtawar Malik.. what latest propaganda..?
5 hours ago · Like ·

Anil Gupta Omar I don't think this is JIHAD.Eliminating those whom you don't like.
5 hours ago · Like · 1 person ·

Taj Tantry yes Anil this is murder. plain murder.
5 hours ago · Like · 2 people ·

Vivek Gupta Blamed it on Jagmohan.
5 hours ago · Like ·

Gujjar BakerwalConference Geelani sahib should be prosecuted like any other murderer , if law in this country is equal for all
4 hours ago · Like · 1 person ·

Vishakha Raijada It's said that everyone's considered innocent till proved guilty... & criminals do get benefit of doubt..... so it's duty of all the journalists to gather the facts put solid before every one..in such away that even common man should follow..
4 hours ago · Like ·

Muhammad Dilshad what is authenticity of this news?????????
3 hours ago · Like ·

Epilogue Press ‎@MD: This neither a news nor our discovery. A Pakistani journalist Arif Jamal has claimed this in his book
about an hour ago · Like ·

Vishakha Raijada ‎@EP..Oh Thought so!!!
about an hour ago · Like ·

Epilogue Press name of this book is 'Shadow War' and is already making lot of noises in Pakistani Press
about an hour ago · Like · 1 person ·

Vishakha Raijada Thank you EB for this info..
about an hour ago · Like · 2 people ·

Anmol Sharma this is a very big scoop....
about an hour ago · Like ·

Ladakh Ki Gyurja what is this? unbelievable!!!!!
about an hour ago · Like ·

Vishakha Raijada Btw someone shud write abot the worst condition of Meerjai Muslims in Pakistan...they're treated worst than those Din-daar Muslims...this's in-human..

Meerjai Muslim is a sect of Muslims which has got their shrine in part of Punjab in India....(probably near Jallunder ..not very sure)...and one of the founder of that sect was the famous saint. was migrated from Maharashtra.. nicknamed as Sheikh Kad`eoo.. or Kad`eoo Babaa.....disciple of saint Nooruddin (whose shrine is in Thane near Mumbai) ...a Sufi saint from Kashmir...(some devotees claim that Seikh Kad`eoo was from a migrated Kashmiri family...migrated during Mughal times )
about an hour ago · Like · 1 person ·

Apoorva Lamba Jago Kashmiriyon jago....
21 minutes ago · Like ·

Dr. Jitendra Singh Expressing serious concern over the Union Home Minister P. Chidambram’s remarks complementing the Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister


BJP Chief Spokesperson & National Executive Member, Dr. Jitendra Singh Expressing serious concern over the Union Home Minister P. Chidambram’s remarks complementing the Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister


News (01.02.2011): BJP Chief Spokesperson & National Executive Member, Dr. Jitendra Singh Expressing serious concern over the Union Home Minister P. Chidambram’s remarks complementing the Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=178697212166054&set=a.115528178482958.7335.109967212372388&ref=nf


Expressing serious concern over the Union Home Minister P. Chidambram’s remarks complementing the Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister for what he described as “tactful” handling of Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) Rashtriya Ekta Yatra last week, BJP Chief Spokesperson & National Executive Member, Dr. Jitendra Singh said that the Home Minister’s remarks not only exposed the Congress-led UPA government’s connivance with the NC led state government in methodically suppressing legitimate democratic mainstream activity but it was also a gross impropriety on the part of Union Home Minister to compliment the state authorities which had unauthorisedly kept in illegal detention three senior national leaders two of whom Arun Jaitley and Sushma Swaraj enjoyed the status of Union Cabinet Ministers.

Dr. Jitendra Singh said that at a time when the BJP’s central leadership had taken up the matter with Manmohan Singh government, it smacked of high-handedness on the part of Home Minister to endorse the treatment meted out to Arun Jaitley, Sushma Swaraj and Anant Kumar.

The BJP is seriously worried about the Union Home Minister’s frequent instigatory initiatives which have time and again tended to demoralize the nationalistic and patriotic forces in the state and provided encouragement to separatists, Dr. Jitendra Singh said. It seems as though Chidambarm has forsaken his constitutional duties to uphold the sovereignty of the Indian republic and is instead contributing to further loosening of the relationship bond of state of Jammu and Kashmir with the rest of India. Stating that there was a clear case of unholy patronage flowing in from 10 janpath for the continuance of a separatist friendly regime in Jammu & Kashmir, Dr. Singh said the BJP leadership views “Azadi”, “Autonomy” and “self-rule” as part of the same separatist spectrum and warns Chidambram against making any irresponsible observations or announcements during his forthcoming visit to J&K starting from February 03.

Playing nationalism to public gallery

Playing nationalism to public gallery

Updated on Sunday, January 30, 2011, 16:50

http://www.zeenews.com/blog/66/blog487.html

In a meek surrender to separatists, Omar Abdullah-led Jammu and Kashmir government succeeded in foiling BJP’s effort to hoist the Tricolour at Lal Chowk on Republic Day 2011.

It was for the second consecutive time in the last two decades, the Jammu and Kashmir government broke a convention trying to unfurl the national flag at Lal Chowk.


In 1991-92 then BJP president Murli Manohar Joshi took out the Rastriya Ekta Yatra from Kanyakumari to Srinagar. Breaking the separatist writ, he hoisted the Tricolour on January 26, 1992 for the first time ever at Lal Chowk amidst rocket attacks by militants. Remember, the flag hosting ceremony lasted precisely 13 minutes, surrounded by 80 yatri s and conducted under the chill gaze of an estimated 1000 security men. It was Narasimha Rao-led Congress government at the Centre that provided security for the historic flag hosting ceremony during the height of militancy in Jammu and Kashmir. Since then, the security forces had been hoisting the national flag on Republic Day and Independence Day at the clock tower till 2009.

Much has changed. Last year, the Congress-led UPA government at the Centre was a mute spectator to Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah’s move to suspend the unfurling of Tricolour by security forces at Lal Chowk. This time the Congress-led Union government went a step ahead and threw its weight behind Omar Abdullah government in foiling BJP’s proposed program to hoist the Tricolour at Lal Chowk.

BJP’s march to unfurl the Tricolour at Lal Chowk was part of its Rashtriya Ekta Yatra launched by party’s youth wing Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM). It was a sequel of the same yatra undertaken by Murli Manohar Joshi in 1991-92. This time Anurag Thakur, the president of BJYM, was spearheading the second edition of the Ekta Yatra.

“Kashmir belongs to India and the whole India belongs to Kashmiris. The pain of Kashmir is the pain of India. We need to feel it,” Anurag said in an exclusive chat with this writer in New Delhi before he left for Kolkata to kick start the Ekta Yatra.

But what prompted the saffron party to replay the Ekta Yatra amidst opposition demand for JPC on 2G scam. Perhaps the present row over Kashmir is the best answer for this. The yatra was launched at a time when anti-national forces are openly endorsing the idea of disintegrating Kashmir from the rest of India. The likes of Arundhati Roy and Syed Ali Geelani continue to make seditious speeches on Kashmir and thoroughly use the right to freedom of expression against the country. And when the secessionists make merry, the Congress-led UPA government is napping. At that point in time BJYM’s Rastriya Ekta Yatra and its proposed flag hoisting program at Lal Chowk was indeed a challenge to the separatist forces.

Rastriya Ekta Yatra-II was flagged off on National Youth Day in Kolkata, the birthplace of legendry Syama Prasad Mookerjee. The two-week long yatra covered 3037 kilometres and traversed through nine states. It was peaceful from the beginning to the end. The yatra was supposed to culminate at Mookherjee’s martyr place Srinagar where BJYM had plans to hoist Tricolour at Lal Chowk. But the yatris were stopped on their way to Srinagar at Punjab-Jammu boarder of Lakhanpur and arrested under Section 144 of IPC by J&K Police for defying the “prohibitory orders” imposed by the state government. The result: Flag was not hoisted at Lal Chowk this year keeping with the writ of the separatists.

It would however be unfair not to see the context. J&K has been passing through a very tumultuous time recently. Looking at the present situation, the flip side of the argument is that would it be correct to rock the J&K boat? Those who believe in that line argue that BJP’s programme could have an adverse impact on the peace of the Valley which has seen an upsurge in violence recently.

Having stated that, we must also remember that last year separatists had flown the Pakistani flag atop Lal Chowk. The Omar Abdullah government was a silent observer to those anti-national crescendos. The state government also preferred to remain mum when Tricolour was burnt in full public display on a number of occasions.

Rashtriya Ekta Yatra has brought the other side of the Kashmir story to the limelight. There is no denial that Kashmir problem is the result of historic blunder committed during the early days of post independence era.

Those in know of political history of Kashmir must be aware of the fact that Kashmir was never under direct British rule. It was a princely state which acceded to India by virtue of a constitutional document called ‘Instrument of Accession’ under the Indian Independence Act, 1947.

Maharaja Hari Singh, then supreme ruler of Jammu and Kashmir signed the Instrument of Succession on October 26, 1947. Though the format of the Instrument of Accession applied to Jammu and Kashmir was the same as was executed for other princely states, then interim Indian government led by Jawaharlal Nehru agreed that ‘final decision’ with regard to the accession would be taken by the Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir and in the intervening period ‘a temporary provision’ was made in the Constitution of India.

BJP was possibly the first party to voice the national perspective on Kashmir. it. The party is a descendant of erstwhile Bharatiya Jana Sangh founded by Syama Prasad Mookerjee. It was Mookerjee who scripted an uprising with his famous slogan on Kashmir-- Ek desh mein do Pradhan, do Vidhan, do Nishan nahi chalegi, nahi chalegi (The country will never accept a system which allows two Prime Ministers, two Constitutions and two National flags). He went to Kashmir as an Indian citizen but was arrested and jailed in a dilapidated house. He died while in custody.

But when BJP was in power, did the party really remember the sacrifice of Mookerjee from whom it takes inspiration from? Do not forget, it was BJP which backtracked on its ‘commitment’ to abolish the Article 370 with an excuse of ‘compulsion of coalition politics’.

Now, out of power the saffron party sees the need to pick up the issue of abrogation of Article 370.Perhaps of late, the saffron party has realised its mistake of not going with the majority sentiments of Jammu and Kashmir after reeling under two successive Lok Sabha poll defeats. But is BJP really committed to its demand on Article 370?

BJYM’s Rashtriya Ekta Yatra has no doubt made it to the headlines. But will it be able to contribute in real terms to bringing peace, wiping out the tears of the hundreds of thousands voiceless of the Valley or promoting national integration?
(The views expressed by the author in the blog are his/her own)


india`s majority community has to act soon as possible or else india will lose kashmir to pakistan as half of the kashmir has already been lost. india`s majority community (hindus) are not violent unless they are forced to be so, for example, burning the people alive in train in godhra can make any hindu angry, and as a matter of fact, over this kind of matter any community should feel angry, the only people who dont feel angry are cowards who like to put a sticker of gandhism on their forehead, but they forget that tomorrow it might be their turn to be burnt alive). nobody talks about the people who died there in the burning train. india`s youth has to act now. india has been always polite to the minority community since times immemorial, but does being polite means giving up your rights? does it mean letting someone else take over your land and resources? it does not, being polite to minority community simply means live and let live. what troubles me most is why our muslim brothers never showed any anger about the flag hoisting issue in kashmir, why they never said go ahead, let the indian flag honor the land. i never hated muslim, i dont hate muslims, but please my muslim brothers, just help me not hate you. you are also humans, you have family, wife, sister, children. you live in india, then why support these congress who did so many scams and willing to support the political party in kashmir who wants pakistan to take over kashmir. why???? and please keep in mind, i might sound like i am pleading for peace, and i might be. but i wont pleade for my life, it will be someone else, who will be pleading for life. stop making us mad, support india, support the tricolor, hell with religions, think about nation. wake up people, wake up.

Bhupendra Patel - USA

very good blog.

congress along with omar is trying to appease the minority community in evry possible way.

tricolour was burnt and there was no action frm omar`s govt. however he acts so swiftly to avoid unfurling of the tricolour at lalchowk!!

Anand - Bengaluru

i am happy after seeing so my -ve critism in the media some one have come with the +ve sentiments for the support of ekta yatra. i believe those who oppose these kind on national movement should be labelled as anti-national and thrown out of country

Vinamp - Pune

the indians are living in denial about kashmir.it is in india`s interest to let the kashmiris decide their future. india won the battle but unfortunately lost the war in kashmir. india instead of fighting for the kashmiris fought the kashmiris who were caught in the midst of the proxy war between the two nuclear armed neighbours.for the last over 60 years, india`s policy of imposing it`s puppets to govern the kashmiris remotely has backfired. india nominated governors to kashmir like jagmohan and gen. sk sinha who are virulently anti muslim and anti kashmiri. india has lost kashmir forever. hoisting the indian flag on every chowk or even every house in kashmir will not help.

shiraz - Kashmir

brilliant blog.appreciate the pertinent points raised by the author.the ruling upa is guilty of collaborating with the anti- india conglomerate. its a dangerous mindset that needs to be defeated.yes, the bjp`s the then explanation of ``coalition compulsion`` concerning article 370 was simply a facade.the party simply did not try.however, its present effort to hoist the national flag is timely.kashmir is integral to india.the upa just cant force another partition of our country via its dubious brand of politics.lets fight back.wont mind a war even.

Kuna Kayasth - Bhubaneswar

Gamble or be damned : Byword: India Today

Gamble or be damned : Byword: India Today

Gamble or be damned
by M.J. Akbar

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/Story/127987/Byword/m-j-akbar-writes-on-bjps-ekta-yatra-and-srinagar-fiasco.html

Srinagar's Lal Chowk was a destination for the BJP's Republic Day agenda, but not an objective. The BJP was sending a message to India rather than Kashmir, which it did effectively enough thanks to the caravan of cameras that is in statutory attendance around any drama. Once the curious harmony of military drumbeat and popular-culture rhythm in the January 26 parade is over by noon, it becomes a slow news day. The BJP's tricolour wheeze got screen-to-screen coverage. Point made.

Parties in power often need the crutch of ambiguity; being forthright might be quite the wrong thing to do when you are trying to squeeze a negotiated calm out of ongoing confrontation. A Prime Minister like Dr Manmohan Singh has a natural tendency to rise above the normal play of interests. In fact, both Government and Opposition are acting out what is essentially a charade on Kashmir. Their play is tactical rather than strategic because, despite their differences, neither can see much beyond the present. The BJP is comfortable with a dead-end horizon, because it is fixed on the status quo as a solution, and will fight aggressively to project itself as guardian of this interest.

Dr Singh is uneasy about the inherent instability in irresolution, but is helpless for two reasons. There is no clarity about where to go, how to go and with whom to go forward. He is walking on a long, lonely road, with shifting and even shifty companions. He cannot afford to be certain about Pakistan, which must travel alongside, albeit at some distance, for anything to change for the better. With the best will, Pakistani leaders may be unable to cooperate on a route that has been waylaid by three wars, and is regularly invaded by pirates and terrorists.


Survival is the first duty of any politician, and this means that he cannot wander too far from the policy limits set by public opinion. But Dr Singh, like his predecessor Atal Bihari Vajpayee, also has to assess and factor in the variables of managing his own party. The Congress is not interested in winning the Nobel Prize for Peace. It would much prefer another term in Delhi to a place in history.

A bad agreement between India and Pakistan is immeasurably worse than no agreement; and so far there has been no pact that has been equally cheered by both sides. The surface may seem placid in the event of a non-event, but dormant passions spit out like lava when agreement is reached through compromise.

Field Marshal Ayub Khan, author of the 1965 war, could not survive the Tashkent Agreement of January 1966 because he had promised his people triumph and ended the game with a draw. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, chief theorist of that war, became a hero when he betrayed his mentor, Ayub. Lal Bahadur Shastri would not have received too warm a welcome back home either in 1966; but he died suddenly just after putting his signature to the Tashkent pact. Bhutto made it known to Mrs Indira Gandhi at Shimla in 1972 that he would not be able to return home if he accepted the Cease-Fire Line in Kashmir as the permanent boundary. She conceded the point, with consequences that engulf and enrage us today.
The Congress is not interested in winning the Nobel Prize for Peace. It would much prefer another term in Delhi to a place in history.

There seem two unhappy options. Nothing can change in Kashmir except atmospherics. Or there is a "settlement" that either dresses up the generational Pakistani demand for the "liberation" of Kashmiri Muslims from "Hindu rule" with fudge; or changes the existing map in Pakistan's favour: try selling the first in the Pakistani bazaar and the second in an Indian mall.

Those who do not learn from history, we have been advised, are condemned to repeat its follies. India and Pakistan may be suffering from too much history. Generations change quickly in power; at best they last a decade. Each new incumbent, glowing with good intentions, hallucinates about writing the future on a clean page, and then inlaid stains within the paper seep through and blot the message.

Pessimism is boring when you are young, but at least it is not fatal. Optimism can be heartbreaking. Equally, it is arid and pointless to live without hope. So what do we do about this trap that has become coated with poisonous rust? Doing nothing is not an answer.

Maybe what India and Pakistan need in Delhi and Islamabad are not two dynamic politicians but two compulsive and courageous gamblers.


Posted by: A K SAXENA
DELHI,INDIA | January 29, 2011 | 14:09 IST
I am sorry,Mr Akbar.One can't claim to be a nationalist by merely castigating the BJP or the Congress. One is not interested in knowing the nuances of differences between the "destination"and "objective" of the BJP's agenda.As a citizen of India, I expect you to enlighten me whether one could unfurl the tricolour at the Lal Chowk,Srinagar on the Republic Day.Is it not my fundamental right to do so? Not a word has been said about it in your column. Why are you so biased in favour of the Congress party and its de jure PM. He is neither a politician nor an administrator Post Your Comment
and is presiding over the mess, we are in today.Have a heart,Akbar Sahab!


Govt must take a holistic view on J&K: Army chief : North: India Today

Govt must take a holistic view on J&K: Army chief : North: India Today

Govt must take a holistic view on J&K: Army chief
by Rahul Kanwal (Headlines Today Bureau)

New Delhi, January 27, 2011 | Updated 21:22 IST

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/article/govt-must-take-a-holistic-view-on-j&k-says-army-chief-general-v-k-singh/1/127898.html

Describing the recent flag-hoisting controversy in Jammu & Kashmir as "political wrangling and political games", Chief of Army Staff General VK Singh on Thursday said that the government needed to stop taking decisions that were expedient and aimed at narrow purposes.


In an exclusive interview to Headlines Today, General Singh said, "Jammu & Kashmir is a complicated set of things. There has to be a holistic view on what we do there. We have to take a very different view for the long term. Don't take decisions for the sake of expediency for a certain purpose. You have to have focus and resolve, and the government should put some people on the job."

Asserting once again that a troop withdrawal was not an option at this time, the Army chief said, "The day the 42 camps on the other side are wound up, and Pakistan stops its proxy war, that would be the time to withdraw our troops. Until that time, it is not possible. J&K is not about mathematics. We have to be pragmatic about troop reductions. " As a sidenote, the Chief indicated that it was impossible for these terror camps to function without the support and compicity of elements in the Pakistan establishment. At the same time, he asserted that it was in India's diplomatic interest that a dialogue process with Pakistan was kept active.

General Singh warned that the country ignored the ideology being preached in the Kashmir valley at its peril. "We must look very closely at the ideology being preached. What are we doing to counter this ideology? Are the mainstream political parties doing anything about it?" Emphasising that the Army was not an obstacle to political endeavours, the Chief suggested that the entire approach to J&K required new thinking.

Asked about the series of scams that have implicated generals, even former chiefs, General Singh said, "I have to ensure that the backbone of the army is stiffened. It had become flexible. We have told our rank and file that we will spare nobody -- whether you are a sepoy or a general, nobody will be spared if you do wrong. It is certainly sad, but these scams are abberations. We have told our rank and file that if you see something wrong happenening, stand up and speak out, or you will be considered part of it."

Expressing hurt at the damage scams like Sukna, Adarsh and Kandivali had dealt to the image of the Army, the Chief said, "It is my fervent desire, I have made a promise to myself that I will not allow these things to happen again."